Do We Need to Change the Definition of Science?
Posted on May 19, 2008
Filed Under Sideblog | Leave a Comment
Woit on do we need to change the definition of science? I’m not sure there ever was a definition. Thus the demarcation problem.
Related posts:
- Woit at Blogging Heads
- Sean Carroll and David Albert
- Review of the Princeton Companion to Mathematics
- The Debate over Boltzmann Brains
- McCain’s Biggest Contributor Also Leading Science Advocate
- The Democratic War on Science?
Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Quote of the Moment
-
Search
-
Recent Comments
- Ilyan Kei Lavan… in Intelligence, Math and Field
- ljmahwkhao in LDS Philosophy Blogs
- Clark in Better to Be an Adulterer than a Mo…
- Crude in Better to Be an Adulterer than a Mo…
- Clark in Intelligence, Math and Field
- Clark in Better to Be an Adulterer than a Mo…
- Crude in Better to Be an Adulterer than a Mo…
- Crude in Better to Be an Adulterer than a Mo…
- cvg in Intelligence, Math and Field
- DavidC in Intelligence, Math and Field
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
-
Blogroll
-
Admin
-
Unique Visitors
.jpg)