Is Metaphysics a Sham?
Posted on July 10, 2008
Filed Under Sideblog | Leave a Comment
The Splintered Mind on whether metaphysics is a sham. His main target are all those thought experiments of possibility. I agree they prove nothing ultimately. But they are very illustrative. I think metaphysics proceeds ultimately only via empiricism, albeit with very weak arguments. Which I don’t this is positivism. But I think attacking metaphysics typically ends up in a positivist rut.
Related posts:
- Constraining Metaphysics
- The Problem with Metaphysics
- Sider Defends Metaphysics
- Naturalist Metaphysics
- Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science
- Vernacular Lanugage
Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Quote of the Moment
-
Search
-
Recent Comments
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Clark in Materialism and Objects
- Mark D. in Materialism and Objects
- Mark Dreher in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Mark Dreher in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Peter in Maverick Philosopher on Mormonism &…
- Clark in Cognitive Aging - the Perils
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- larryco_ in Mormonism and the Absolute
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
-
Blogroll
-
Admin
-
Unique Visitors
.jpg)