<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Believing in Anything</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/09/23/believing-in-anything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/09/23/believing-in-anything/</link>
	<description>Musings on Science, Religion and Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:57:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/09/23/believing-in-anything/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=618#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Clarke is definitely an atheist who keeps putting a God in his stories.  

Having said that I think there&#039;s something to be said for atheists who adopt more philosophically Greek ideas of God.  Say pantheism.  What I think many, if not most, atheists are opposed to isn&#039;t the  idea of the absolute or some ultimate origin.  Rather it is to the idea of a personal interventionist God.  So the line between deist and atheist is a blurry one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Clarke is definitely an atheist who keeps putting a God in his stories.  </p>
<p>Having said that I think there&#8217;s something to be said for atheists who adopt more philosophically Greek ideas of God.  Say pantheism.  What I think many, if not most, atheists are opposed to isn&#8217;t the  idea of the absolute or some ultimate origin.  Rather it is to the idea of a personal interventionist God.  So the line between deist and atheist is a blurry one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/09/23/believing-in-anything/comment-page-1/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=618#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>A great term I came across a couple of years ago that never seemed to catch on was the &quot;voodoo atheists&quot; - people who claim to be atheist and then embrace several new age or other supernatural beliefs. 

One example that springs to mind is J. Michael Straczynski, the guy behind Babylon 5.  He&#039;s rather sympathetic towards religion, actually, but he claims to be an atheist.  However, his personal writings and internet postings show that the belief system he gave to the Minbari in Babylon 5 is quite close to his own.  He&#039;s merely replaced &quot;God&quot; with &quot;the universe&quot; and thus claims to be an atheist because his god goes by a different name.

Arthur C. Clarke also springs to mind, though he jokingly referred to himself as a &quot;lapsed atheist.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great term I came across a couple of years ago that never seemed to catch on was the &#8220;voodoo atheists&#8221; &#8211; people who claim to be atheist and then embrace several new age or other supernatural beliefs. </p>
<p>One example that springs to mind is J. Michael Straczynski, the guy behind Babylon 5.  He&#8217;s rather sympathetic towards religion, actually, but he claims to be an atheist.  However, his personal writings and internet postings show that the belief system he gave to the Minbari in Babylon 5 is quite close to his own.  He&#8217;s merely replaced &#8220;God&#8221; with &#8220;the universe&#8221; and thus claims to be an atheist because his god goes by a different name.</p>
<p>Arthur C. Clarke also springs to mind, though he jokingly referred to himself as a &#8220;lapsed atheist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/09/23/believing-in-anything/comment-page-1/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=618#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;d &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/05/06/i-dont-believe-in-atheists/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;commented on that&lt;/a&gt; a few months back.  Chris over at Mixing Memory has discussed this a lot as well. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/mixingmemory/2008/07/frackin_ass.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s the last post&lt;/a&gt; of that sort)  Of course it&#039;s hardly all or even most atheists of course.  And, to be fair, I have to agree with a lot of the criticisms of Hedges being quite unfair in places or missing the point.  

Of course that&#039;s not what the above study was really getting at.  Just that people tend to believe many things uncritically.  We might point to many religious beliefs as uncritical but people who don&#039;t hold beliefs we&#039;d characterize as stereotypically religious seem to do the same thing.  The critical stance is, I believe, a fairly unnatural one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d <a href="http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/05/06/i-dont-believe-in-atheists/" rel="nofollow">commented on that</a> a few months back.  Chris over at Mixing Memory has discussed this a lot as well. (<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/mixingmemory/2008/07/frackin_ass.php" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s the last post</a> of that sort)  Of course it&#8217;s hardly all or even most atheists of course.  And, to be fair, I have to agree with a lot of the criticisms of Hedges being quite unfair in places or missing the point.  </p>
<p>Of course that&#8217;s not what the above study was really getting at.  Just that people tend to believe many things uncritically.  We might point to many religious beliefs as uncritical but people who don&#8217;t hold beliefs we&#8217;d characterize as stereotypically religious seem to do the same thing.  The critical stance is, I believe, a fairly unnatural one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris g</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2008/09/23/believing-in-anything/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>chris g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=618#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>You may like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointofinquiry.org/chris_hedges_i_dont_believe_in_atheists/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chris Hedges interview over at Point of Inquiry&lt;/a&gt;.  I thought it was pretty funny.  The interviewer seems used to pat Atheistic answers and struggled to get a number of the points Hedges was making.  Of course, he wasn&#039;t overly cooperative either.  The main point was new atheists end up reproducing fundamentalist views including underlying assumptions that a proper world view can make up for lack of self criticality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may like the <a href="http://www.pointofinquiry.org/chris_hedges_i_dont_believe_in_atheists/" rel="nofollow">Chris Hedges interview over at Point of Inquiry</a>.  I thought it was pretty funny.  The interviewer seems used to pat Atheistic answers and struggled to get a number of the points Hedges was making.  Of course, he wasn&#8217;t overly cooperative either.  The main point was new atheists end up reproducing fundamentalist views including underlying assumptions that a proper world view can make up for lack of self criticality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

