Ontological Argument
Posted on December 29, 2008
Filed Under Sideblog | Leave a Comment
Richard refutes Anselm. I think just thinking through all the ways to refute the ontological argument are interesting. It’s an excellent problem to think through. I like Kant’s existence is not a property approach best. Marion also has a discussion about whether the ontological argument is ontological at all. I’m not sure I agree with Marion (on numerous things) but it is interesting.
Related posts:
- Anselm’s Ontological Argument and the Problem of Evil
- Anselm’s Ontological Proof for God
- Plantinga’s Modal Ontological Argument
- Ontic vs. Ontological
- Epistemological and Ontological Realism
- Who believes in the God that the argument from evil would seek to refute?
Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Quote of the Moment
-
Search
-
Recent Comments
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Clark in Materialism and Objects
- Mark D. in Materialism and Objects
- Mark Dreher in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Mark Dreher in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Peter in Maverick Philosopher on Mormonism &…
- Clark in Cognitive Aging - the Perils
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- larryco_ in Mormonism and the Absolute
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
-
Blogroll
-
Admin
-
Unique Visitors
.jpg)