<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death, Embodiment and Grace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/</link>
	<description>Musings on Science, Religion and Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>If you think grace is something God give out to people he picks then the perspective of &quot;what is reasonably expected&quot; seems fair.  And that&#039;s roughly where Robinson points things, as I understanding.  (Standard caveat that it&#039;s been may years since I last read Robinson and Millet so I&#039;m in no position to represent their thought: I&#039;m going on second hand accounts.)  I think that to the degree people think about grace as something God gives to make up a gap that people think the limits of the gap is based upon some fairness.  What they consider fair tends to vary.  So people who are aware of the influence of the brain in ways that seem uncontrollable in any easy fashion by the individual are willing to ascribe a larger gap than people more skeptical of mental illness or the like.  

I should add that while I may reject the application of scriptural terminology here the actual reason is quite fair and correct.  To me the issue is somewhat less interesting as I tend to see it more as a semantic debate even if it&#039;s not usually presented as such.

That&#039;s because even if the way people &lt;i&gt;talk&lt;/i&gt; about grace might be incorrect the way they &lt;i&gt;demonstrate&lt;/i&gt; understanding of the issues seems correct.  That is once we move from theological &lt;i&gt;formal discourse&lt;/i&gt; to a broader narrative the typical Mormon appears to get it right.  

To me the two clear examples of grace are the Brother of Jared in Ether 3 with the narration of getting the stones lit for the arks and then Lehi and the Liahonah.  I think both these stories, which pretty much every Mormon is extremely familiar with, is pretty evidence in how they relate their own encounters with God&#039;s grace.  They just don&#039;t call it grace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think grace is something God give out to people he picks then the perspective of &#8220;what is reasonably expected&#8221; seems fair.  And that&#8217;s roughly where Robinson points things, as I understanding.  (Standard caveat that it&#8217;s been may years since I last read Robinson and Millet so I&#8217;m in no position to represent their thought: I&#8217;m going on second hand accounts.)  I think that to the degree people think about grace as something God gives to make up a gap that people think the limits of the gap is based upon some fairness.  What they consider fair tends to vary.  So people who are aware of the influence of the brain in ways that seem uncontrollable in any easy fashion by the individual are willing to ascribe a larger gap than people more skeptical of mental illness or the like.  </p>
<p>I should add that while I may reject the application of scriptural terminology here the actual reason is quite fair and correct.  To me the issue is somewhat less interesting as I tend to see it more as a semantic debate even if it&#8217;s not usually presented as such.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because even if the way people <i>talk</i> about grace might be incorrect the way they <i>demonstrate</i> understanding of the issues seems correct.  That is once we move from theological <i>formal discourse</i> to a broader narrative the typical Mormon appears to get it right.  </p>
<p>To me the two clear examples of grace are the Brother of Jared in Ether 3 with the narration of getting the stones lit for the arks and then Lehi and the Liahonah.  I think both these stories, which pretty much every Mormon is extremely familiar with, is pretty evidence in how they relate their own encounters with God&#8217;s grace.  They just don&#8217;t call it grace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CEF</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>CEF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>As I see it, (of course I could be wrong) the problem with placing works before grace, is at what point has one done enough to receive grace?  That is the violence done to grace by the standard interpretation of 2Nephi 25:23.  And yet that interpretation continues to be the standard in the Church. 

Anything short of prevenient grace falls short of being true grace.  If I can/must earn it, why call it grace?

Clark, do you know why the discussion you mention on LDS-Herm is centered on the presumed error of Robinson and Millet, when what they teach seems to be nothing more than what most members believe?  What else could they teach that could be published in Deseret Book.  Blake offers a better understanding of grace, but I seriously doubt if Deseret would publish his books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, (of course I could be wrong) the problem with placing works before grace, is at what point has one done enough to receive grace?  That is the violence done to grace by the standard interpretation of 2Nephi 25:23.  And yet that interpretation continues to be the standard in the Church. </p>
<p>Anything short of prevenient grace falls short of being true grace.  If I can/must earn it, why call it grace?</p>
<p>Clark, do you know why the discussion you mention on LDS-Herm is centered on the presumed error of Robinson and Millet, when what they teach seems to be nothing more than what most members believe?  What else could they teach that could be published in Deseret Book.  Blake offers a better understanding of grace, but I seriously doubt if Deseret would publish his books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>Raymond, I agree that the narrative context is important for understanding Nephi here.  I&#039;d just say that the grace in the narrative is God warning Lehi and providing all these &lt;i&gt;enabling&lt;/i&gt; means for Nephi to do what he needs to do to reach the land of promise.  The Liahonah is the classic example of a metaphor that has a real place in the narrative.  Ditto for the visionary rod of iron.

I think a lot of confusion among LDS arises because there is a lot of latent Calvinist thinking in American culture.  (Even amongst atheists)  I  have a post on this I might post tonight - albeit one done in more technical Derridean language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raymond, I agree that the narrative context is important for understanding Nephi here.  I&#8217;d just say that the grace in the narrative is God warning Lehi and providing all these <i>enabling</i> means for Nephi to do what he needs to do to reach the land of promise.  The Liahonah is the classic example of a metaphor that has a real place in the narrative.  Ditto for the visionary rod of iron.</p>
<p>I think a lot of confusion among LDS arises because there is a lot of latent Calvinist thinking in American culture.  (Even amongst atheists)  I  have a post on this I might post tonight &#8211; albeit one done in more technical Derridean language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark D.</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the root of confusion regarding grace is the absolutist conception of divine omnipotence.  The Santa Claus theory of the atonement, I call it.  Wave a magic wand, we&#039;re done.

I have a radically different conception. Namely that grace only comes from sacrifice.  Divine grace from divine sacrifice.  Not the work of a day, but of an eternity.  Why good works?  Because in the long run, if no one does any work or makes any sacrifices, there is no grace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the root of confusion regarding grace is the absolutist conception of divine omnipotence.  The Santa Claus theory of the atonement, I call it.  Wave a magic wand, we&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>I have a radically different conception. Namely that grace only comes from sacrifice.  Divine grace from divine sacrifice.  Not the work of a day, but of an eternity.  Why good works?  Because in the long run, if no one does any work or makes any sacrifices, there is no grace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Takashi Swenson</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2211</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Takashi Swenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2211</guid>
		<description>Part of the problem with our understanding 2 Nephi 25:23 as Church members is that we take it out of context, even avoiding reading the entire verse.  The proper voice, I think, is ironic: Nephi is telling us how HARD he is working to convince his children and his brethren that we are saved by--NOT incessant work--but by grace, a gift from God through Christ&#039;s atonement.  The phrase &quot;after all we can do&quot;  is not meant in a temporal, sequential sense.  It is meant to convey, as the lead-in of the verse also says, that all of the work we put into trying to save our families would be useless without Christ&#039;s grace/gift/charity.  Nephi is demonstrating that grace comes WITH the work of obedience.  This statement is a bookend with his other oft-quoted statement: &quot;I will go and do what the Lord hath commanded, for I know that the Lord giveth no commandment unto the children of men, save he shall prepare a way for them, that they may accomplish the thing which he commandeth them.&quot;  

That verse also emphasizes that we only accomplish rightous acts through God&#039;s help.  It also says that we can be confident--have faith--that we will receive God&#039;s help IF we are doing what God commands us to do!  In other words, both of these scriptures are Nephi emphasizing that when we do righteous works, to obey God&#039;s commandments--whether obtaining sacred records or teaching our families the plan of salvation--that is when we are receiving God&#039;s help and grace.  There is not a dichotomy between obedient works and grace.  Rather, it is precisely when we make the effort to obey God that God steps in and helps us to do what he commands, to accomplish things that we don&#039;t have the skills or knowledge to do on our own.  Our righteous and faithful works become GRACIOUS and GRACE-FULL works, filled and enabled and empowered by God&#039;s gifts.  We don&#039;t do righteousness first, then wait for Christ&#039;s seal of approval.  It is even as we set out to do obedient works that God&#039;s grace starts flowing into us, enabling and enlightening and encouraging us.  

We Mormons do not need to be forever anxious about whether we are going to receive Christ&#039;s grace.  When we are obedient, we are getting that gift, and the testimony of the Holy Ghost is the manifestation of that grace.  As also are the inspirations we receive when we are teaching as parents, and church leaders, and missionaries.

Perhaps the best way to picture the operation of grace is the invitation of the Savior in Matthew 11, to &quot;take my yoke upon you, for my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.&quot;  The yoke of the Savior is a two-man yoke.  It lifts the burden of our sins, and it does so because Christ is carrying the lion&#039;s share of the load.  For him to lift our load, we must become jointly yoked with him.  We cannot expect him to lift our burden if we are going off somewhere else.  It only works, we only get the help, when the destination we are going to is the one the Savior chooses.  

Finally, the relation of our works to grace is explained by the angel to King Benjamin in Mosiah 3, where we learn that the &quot;natural man&quot; must change, and become like an obedient child, offering up a broken --that is, an obedient and humble and meek--heart, submitting to God as Christ did.  Only when we give ourselves to him can we receive the gift he offers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the problem with our understanding 2 Nephi 25:23 as Church members is that we take it out of context, even avoiding reading the entire verse.  The proper voice, I think, is ironic: Nephi is telling us how HARD he is working to convince his children and his brethren that we are saved by&#8211;NOT incessant work&#8211;but by grace, a gift from God through Christ&#8217;s atonement.  The phrase &#8220;after all we can do&#8221;  is not meant in a temporal, sequential sense.  It is meant to convey, as the lead-in of the verse also says, that all of the work we put into trying to save our families would be useless without Christ&#8217;s grace/gift/charity.  Nephi is demonstrating that grace comes WITH the work of obedience.  This statement is a bookend with his other oft-quoted statement: &#8220;I will go and do what the Lord hath commanded, for I know that the Lord giveth no commandment unto the children of men, save he shall prepare a way for them, that they may accomplish the thing which he commandeth them.&#8221;  </p>
<p>That verse also emphasizes that we only accomplish rightous acts through God&#8217;s help.  It also says that we can be confident&#8211;have faith&#8211;that we will receive God&#8217;s help IF we are doing what God commands us to do!  In other words, both of these scriptures are Nephi emphasizing that when we do righteous works, to obey God&#8217;s commandments&#8211;whether obtaining sacred records or teaching our families the plan of salvation&#8211;that is when we are receiving God&#8217;s help and grace.  There is not a dichotomy between obedient works and grace.  Rather, it is precisely when we make the effort to obey God that God steps in and helps us to do what he commands, to accomplish things that we don&#8217;t have the skills or knowledge to do on our own.  Our righteous and faithful works become GRACIOUS and GRACE-FULL works, filled and enabled and empowered by God&#8217;s gifts.  We don&#8217;t do righteousness first, then wait for Christ&#8217;s seal of approval.  It is even as we set out to do obedient works that God&#8217;s grace starts flowing into us, enabling and enlightening and encouraging us.  </p>
<p>We Mormons do not need to be forever anxious about whether we are going to receive Christ&#8217;s grace.  When we are obedient, we are getting that gift, and the testimony of the Holy Ghost is the manifestation of that grace.  As also are the inspirations we receive when we are teaching as parents, and church leaders, and missionaries.</p>
<p>Perhaps the best way to picture the operation of grace is the invitation of the Savior in Matthew 11, to &#8220;take my yoke upon you, for my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.&#8221;  The yoke of the Savior is a two-man yoke.  It lifts the burden of our sins, and it does so because Christ is carrying the lion&#8217;s share of the load.  For him to lift our load, we must become jointly yoked with him.  We cannot expect him to lift our burden if we are going off somewhere else.  It only works, we only get the help, when the destination we are going to is the one the Savior chooses.  </p>
<p>Finally, the relation of our works to grace is explained by the angel to King Benjamin in Mosiah 3, where we learn that the &#8220;natural man&#8221; must change, and become like an obedient child, offering up a broken &#8211;that is, an obedient and humble and meek&#8211;heart, submitting to God as Christ did.  Only when we give ourselves to him can we receive the gift he offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CEF</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>CEF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>Yea, I thought it was original, but you can use it if you want to.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I thought it was original, but you can use it if you want to.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s got to be the first analogy of that sort I&#039;ve ever encountered...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s got to be the first analogy of that sort I&#8217;ve ever encountered&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CEF</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/01/22/death-embodiment-and-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>CEF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=1479#comment-2207</guid>
		<description>I do not think grace is easy to understand, but it is sorta of like the thing with porn, I know it when I see it.  I know kindness and forgiveness when I see it.  I know what changed my heart, and it was not reading about grace in a Catholic encyclopedia.

I am not sure what you mean &quot;changes our bodies to change our mind.&quot; All the rest, I totally agree with.  And I have not doubt that I worry about things too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think grace is easy to understand, but it is sorta of like the thing with porn, I know it when I see it.  I know kindness and forgiveness when I see it.  I know what changed my heart, and it was not reading about grace in a Catholic encyclopedia.</p>
<p>I am not sure what you mean &#8220;changes our bodies to change our mind.&#8221; All the rest, I totally agree with.  And I have not doubt that I worry about things too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

