Land War

What will be born new and rise with the Mormon migration to Missouri will be the most exciting thing to observe. I doubt anyone will recognize it to have much to do with Mormonism directly, but I believe it will not come to destroy, but to build up and unify humanity into a cohesive brotherhood.

I have been told by 2 respected Mormons that only those who take the prophesies seriously will return to Missouri.

Potential Reperations:
I have a bill in front of the Missouri Legislature/Judicial Committe regarding land and Mormon involvement. Those with whom I am dealing are Representative Mike Lair, Representative Bryan Stevenson-Chair – Judiciary Committee, and Representative Stanley Cox-Vice-Chair – Judiciary Committee.

Imagine going to a garage sale, and buying a seeming cheap painting, only to later find that behind it was an original Mona Lisa? Many land owners in Missouri, escpecially Daviess and Caldwell Counties are sitting atop Mona Lisa’s and do not even know it. Many of thier lands have been owned by Mormons in the 1830’s and have intrinsic value by the mere fact that many modern Mormons would likely pay many times the normal going rate for its sentimental value. Decendants are now numerous after 170 years and the price would be determined by how many people have a desire for a piece of thier history. My question, is who will the modern church honor? Hugh Pinnock could not emphasize to me enough of their connection and good will with Missouri State officials, but what about the little people of Missouri? Who will stand up for them and their good? With Dawn Harpsters situation, it reflects a very sad pattern and precedent set by the church in that they seem to be more interested in getting valuable, once Mormon, land for pennies on the dollar. Why not be fair to everyone across the board?

I completely and totally sustain the modern Mormon leaders as Prophets, Seers, and Revelators. Whether they are true, false, or fallen Prophets, that is between them and God. I have no control.

I think it hard to base a movement around a few hundred fundamentalists.

Mr. Foli: I don’t know, nor do I care, what ill will you are harboring against the LDS church. But if you had one thought in your erstwhile empty head, you would realize that Dawn is a con-artist. Not a martyr, not a scapegoat, not a ‘human’ being who made a mistake, not a good person gone wrong. The only promise she was made was by herself to herself when she promised she would steal others’ money and use it for her own agenda(s). What about the fact that she allocuted in federal court and admitted – outright – that she did NOT work for the mormon church? Was she afraid to testify against them due to the mormon gangs in prison? I realize how ludicrous that is, but no quite as unimaginably ridiculous as what you are spewing. Oh, yeah, there is that little matter that she manufactured title insurance and produced imaginary contracts. But you’re right, poor Dawn…she’s SUCH a good person, and she just didn’t deserve what she got. It is evident to me that you are simply using this forum as a vehicle to spread your intolerant and hate-filled ideas about Mormons under the guise of sympathy for the devil. The problem is that people like yourself, and Dawn Harpster, would rather put the blame squarely on the heads of, well, anyone within range, than accept responsibility for your own losses and mistakes. Bone up on your current events. Ask NorBank, which is a small, locally owned bank in N.K.C., by the way, not a huge multi-national conglomerate,whether Dawn was victimized by the mormons. I’d be willing to bet the folks who lost their jobs due to what Dawn did wouldn’t think so. Talk to someone who really WAS a victim. No, too much for you? Then think about this…this is all she was CAUGHT doing. You really believe this is all she did? Serial killers start with torturing small animals, politicians start with grade school elections. See where I’m going here? I am curious – I’ve known Dawn for about 15 years. How long have you known her? What I think is amazing, is that in reality (would you like to come and visit here with the rest of us?) the bank and the individuals DAWN stole from were the victims, and yet you actually blame the mormon church. Do you hate them so much that you would excuse what she did? What if she had comitted murder and said ‘the Mormons made me do it’? I wasn’t stupid enough to buy the twinkie defense but somehow I think you would’ve been. I guess being a teacher has given me the ability to know right from wrong, which is apparently too much for you to grasp, with or without your Patty Hearst-style excuses. I cannot believe that you would put your name to such a ridiculous and totally implausible theory. Finally, I have one thing to say about the completely laughable fact that you would STILL believe Dawn wrote the article you’re talking about. When she would steal another’s land…their property…the very home they raise their children in, why on earth would she not lie about writing an article? But you’re right. It was those evil mormons. The devil made her do it, and she ultimately has zero culpability. Really? I think the real shame is that she pled guilty, admitted her crime, and still basically got off completely. She gets to spend 4 1/2 years in a federal playground, then get out and take the rest of her life paying back the $800k + that she had the pleasure of spending even though she didn’t bother to earn it. If you truly believe what you are selling, I would LOVE to hear your theories on alien abductions and government conspiracies…

(by the way, I’m not sure what ‘stautus’ and ‘missoui’ are, but before you write about things of which you have absolutely no knowledge, I would at the very least use spell check).

And I ask those who wish to express thier ideas to come into the light and say who you are and take responsibility for your words.