<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSM &amp; Religious Liberty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/05/06/ssm-religious-liberty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/05/06/ssm-religious-liberty/</link>
	<description>Musings on Science, Religion and Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:57:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/05/06/ssm-religious-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-2622</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=2085#comment-2622</guid>
		<description>As I said on that Prop 82 thread a few months back, I think many religious people see it as a state imposition on a religious symbol.  Sort of as if the state starts regulating religious acts.  That&#039;s not to deny some people draw more conspiratorial or silly implications.  But as I&#039;ve long said I think the state should just get out of the marriage business entirely.  Have civil unions only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on that Prop 82 thread a few months back, I think many religious people see it as a state imposition on a religious symbol.  Sort of as if the state starts regulating religious acts.  That&#8217;s not to deny some people draw more conspiratorial or silly implications.  But as I&#8217;ve long said I think the state should just get out of the marriage business entirely.  Have civil unions only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dorfman</title>
		<link>http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/05/06/ssm-religious-liberty/comment-page-1/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dorfman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=2085#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>I agree, the presumed conflict between SSM and religious liberty is non-existent.  So why are so many (religious) people against it, since it would cause them no hardship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the presumed conflict between SSM and religious liberty is non-existent.  So why are so many (religious) people against it, since it would cause them no hardship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

