Comments on: Why Heidegger? http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/06/03/why-heidegger/ Musings on Science, Religion and Philosophy Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:57:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Clark http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/06/03/why-heidegger/comment-page-1/#comment-2809 Clark Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:31:48 +0000 http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=2155#comment-2809 Yes, withdrawal is very similar to the Zen notions of no-mind. Kuhn and Heidegger are, in some ways, quite similar. In other ways they differ - especially over how a single experiment can be paradigm changing. Heidegger allows for a single event to completely shift the enframing. I wrote a <a href="http://www.libertypages.com/clark/10753.html" rel="nofollow">post about this</a> back in the days when I had more time to devote to the blog. Yes, withdrawal is very similar to the Zen notions of no-mind.

Kuhn and Heidegger are, in some ways, quite similar. In other ways they differ – especially over how a single experiment can be paradigm changing. Heidegger allows for a single event to completely shift the enframing. I wrote a post about this back in the days when I had more time to devote to the blog.

]]> By: Rich Knapton http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/06/03/why-heidegger/comment-page-1/#comment-2808 Rich Knapton Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:36:33 +0000 http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=2155#comment-2808 When you talked about Heidegger and 'enframing' Kuhn's 'paradigms' came to mind (without the technology of course). Rich When you talked about Heidegger and ‘enframing’ Kuhn’s ‘paradigms’ came to mind (without the technology of course).

Rich

]]> By: Rich Knapton http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/06/03/why-heidegger/comment-page-1/#comment-2807 Rich Knapton Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:24:34 +0000 http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=2155#comment-2807 With regard to withdrawal, Miyamoto Musashi, in the Book of Five Rings (1635), wrote that the samurai was to practice until the sword became no sword and intention became no intension. Rich With regard to withdrawal, Miyamoto Musashi, in the Book of Five Rings (1635), wrote that the samurai was to practice until the sword became no sword and intention became no intension.

Rich

]]> By: Clark http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/06/03/why-heidegger/comment-page-1/#comment-2794 Clark Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:10:45 +0000 http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=2155#comment-2794 Borgmann I've only read a little of. He becomes much more pragmatic with time turning to a lot of semiotics. So he's definitely up my alley in many ways. Somewhat coincidentally I'd come upon a full issue of <a href="http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v6n1/" rel="nofollow">Techné devoted to his work</a>. <i>Understanding Computers and Cognition</i> I'd read a long, long time ago. Before I was introduced to Heidegger formally. I probably ought reread it one of these days. Borgmann I’ve only read a little of. He becomes much more pragmatic with time turning to a lot of semiotics. So he’s definitely up my alley in many ways. Somewhat coincidentally I’d come upon a full issue of Techné devoted to his work.

Understanding Computers and Cognition I’d read a long, long time ago. Before I was introduced to Heidegger formally. I probably ought reread it one of these days.

]]> By: Michael Dorfman http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/2009/06/03/why-heidegger/comment-page-1/#comment-2791 Michael Dorfman Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:19:32 +0000 http://www.libertypages.com/cgw/?p=2155#comment-2791 In terms of Heidegger and Computer Interface Design, I'd strongly recommend Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores's "Understanding Computers and Cognition", and the work of Albert Borgmann. In terms of Heidegger and Computer Interface Design, I’d strongly recommend Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores’s “Understanding Computers and Cognition”, and the work of Albert Borgmann.

]]>