Latour vs. Derrida
Posted on November 4, 2009
Filed Under Sideblog | Leave a Comment
Latour vs. Derrida conceived of in terms of the individual. “Latour is saying that nothing is singular (irreducible) because it always needs others. Derrida would say everything is singular (irreducible) because it (a thing) needs others.” Of course, as Mike says, things are much more complex. For Derrida the singular isn’t an atomistic singular, for instance.
Related posts:
- Harman and Latour
- Ereignis and Peirce
- Existence, Quantification, and Singulars
- Derrida and the Text
- Derrida and Object Oriented Philosophy
- The Derrida Debate
Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Quote of the Moment
-
Search
-
Recent Comments
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Clark in Materialism and Objects
- Mark D. in Materialism and Objects
- Mark Dreher in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Mark Dreher in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- Peter in Maverick Philosopher on Mormonism &…
- Clark in Cognitive Aging - the Perils
- Clark in Heidegger vs. Levinas
- larryco_ in Mormonism and the Absolute
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
-
Blogroll
-
Admin
-
Unique Visitors
.jpg)